Does the 'Appropriate Person'
template work?
Boston-based Peter Mahoney, founder and CEO of plannuh, Inc. explains what “The Appropriate Person” template looks like…
“The basic format looks like this,” says Mr. Mahoney.
Subject: Appropriate Person?
Hi Bob,
I wonder if you could direct me to the person in your organization responsible for [buying something that is usually not directly related to my job]. My company makes the world’s best [thing that I don’t really care about] it would really be to your advantage to hear more about it.My senior vice president (also known as another sales rep) is going to be in your area next week and he would like to meet with you.
Sincerely,
A. Lazy Guy
Senior Executive Salesperson
“They don’t really have the right contact for their solution—so they would like me to do their research for them,” says Mr. Mahoney.
“There is a popular book in the market today promoting this type of technique,” says Jason Panici, Business Development Manager at CompTIA. “The book is ‘Predictable Revenue’… Many modern sales departments are employing the techniques found in it.”
Mr. Panici says the “appropriate person” email is one of many cold email templates sales professionals have in their sales toolkit. He recommends it.
However, he says, “Sales professionals are being lazy if this is the only tactic they use to get to the decision maker.”
Does it work?
What’s the bottom line on this technique?
To some degree, it depends what you sell—and to whom. Some say yes, others no.
“In my experience it does work,” says Isaac Liebes of Green Light Energy Conservation.
But only when you:
- approach someone who actually has the ability to point you in the right direction;
- present enough compelling information to the incorrect (initial) point of contact—where they now see a benefit to forward the sender onward.
In response to Peter Mahoney, Frank Stellato, VP Sales at American Lazer, recently asked, “Why do you (Peter) call the email prospectors lazy?”
“Did you stop to think the email was only one method they were using?”
Point taken. But what does diligence of sellers have to do with what matters most—does this approach actually work?
Increasingly, no. Not in our students’ experience, nor in my own personal practice.
Here are a few reasons why this tactic fails. The technique:
- Is targeted for deletion by humans and spam filters (machine learning)
- Signals “I’m not willing to do the homework on your organization” (in an age where research tools like LinkedIn abound)
- Is a cut-and-paste template (contains nothing original/personalized)
The inbound emails have gotten so intense Peter Mahoney (a chief executive) set up an automated email filter—targeting subject lines with “appropriate person” for instant deletion.
Reasons to re-think using it
So what do others say about this rabidly popular, highly template-able (cut-paste-send) and impersonal technique?
“That whole generic ‘who’s the right person?’ approach isn’t credible anymore because LinkedIn enables us to see quite a few things about our customers,” says cold email consultant, Heather Morgan.
“The idea that you’re just looking for the right person, and don’t know who it is, is only credible if your prospect has a title that is very ambiguous or a role that could belong to different titles.”
Cathy Patalas of email provider Woodpecker.co sees it similarly. “When I see the (appropriate person) subject line, I know right away what I’ll find inside… a sales pitch,” says Ms. Patalas.
“I know what the sender will expect me to do in the call-to-action. It feels like an old trick and I don’t want to get tricked. So my reflex is to ignore, or even delete, the email immediately.”
Jeb Blount is a sales trainer and author of Fanatical Prospecting… with decades of sales experience under his belt. Here’s what he says:
“Statistically speaking it didn’t work then and it doesn’t work now. It is and always has been losing strategy.”
In fact, Mr. Blount recently wrote back to a rep using the ‘appropriate person’ cold email on him. He said:
“Dear Ryan: (Rather than ask if I’m the right person) The better question to have asked is: ‘Is your firm large enough to use our software?’ I visited your company’s site—did you visit ours? In the time it took you to write/send me four emails, you easily could have looked at our site, determined we’re not a fit, and removed us from your list after the first unanswered contact. Looks like a cool product for the right customer. Best of luck targeting your prospects.”
I frankly would never suggest anyone asking such a question (‘Is your firm large enough to use our software?’) but that’s another story! You get the point.
This is what we are learning from our most creative, diligent students of the Spark Selling technique. The truth about what works is in your grasp. Challenge your buyer to invite you into a discussion.
What’s holding you back from joining our coaching workshops? Not able to join? No worries. What has your experience been? Share your thoughts below in comments.
© Communications Edge Inc. All rights reserved. InMail® is a registered trademark of LinkedIn® Corporation. This site and the products and services offered on this site are not associated, affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by Linkedin, nor have they been reviewed, tested or certified by LinkedIn.

