Stop 'adding value' when emailing prospects
(do this instead)

Jeff Molander

Sales communication coach & Managing Partner, Communications Edge Inc.

Trainer to brands like:

Telling prospects, "You should consider X solution because Y research says so" is a non-starter. Pushing information at customers works far less than provoking them.


"People generally opt in to receive marketing newsletters, but no one chooses to get cold emails. This simple fact is one of the most important differences between the two," says cold email expert, Heather Morgan.


Ms. Morgan reminds us also how cold emails arrive without context. This is often the first time prospects have heard from you. Further, "you haven’t yet earned their trust or attention yet," says Ms. Morgan.


Context is key. Why talk at when you can talk with? Why push when you can pull, attract the conversation to you? 

Offering value—without having earned the chance to provide it—is failing most sellers. Beware. 

The case for adding value

"Here's the problem with emails today, they lack value," says Jim Keenan of A Sales Guy Inc.  

"If you don't think email needs to offer value, then you are probably one of the perpetrators of horrific emails. Emails must offer value,” he says.

However, our client students, our online Academy members, our sales team and I (myself) are living proof: Cold emails not offering value do earn response.

Look, I know. You may believe email messages need to be seen as credible by prospects. Not always true either. Trying to add value and be seen as credible too soon can sabotage replies.

Why clients reject 'value'

Jim Keenan, A Sales G​uy Inc.

Do you honestly believe customers are waiting for your value to land in their inbox? Consider abandoning this belief.

Mr. Keenan makes a compelling argument for what many believe to be the number one, Golden cold email best practice.

Your email, he says, must offer value, “Because you're asking for something.” A meeting.

“I'm regularly bombarded with horrific emails, almost always asking for 15 or 30 minutes of my time. These emails offer nothing of value and just clutter my inbox. I delete them as fast as I can,” says Mr. Keenan.

“Why should someone open your email or give you 15 minutes of their time if there is no value in it for them? They shouldn't and they won't.”

But what if your cold email didn’t strive to prove value—at all? What if striving to deliver value is the problem?

What if 95% of what you read online is horse hockey! "Fake news?" This is "fake 'best' practices." 

Increasingly, clients open emails based on curiosity about what’s inside the email—not anticipation of value they’ll receive.

Cold sales outreach is not marketing. It's different. There is no expectation of value. In fact, there's an increasing annoyance to being bombarded with what sellers think is valuable. (but is often not!)

Bottom line: "Give value" or "make deposits first" has the wrong goal in mind. Earning a meeting.

Instead, you need to earn a conversation and allow a meeting to be chosen by the customer. Or not.

Compelling a customer to meet—by smothering them with value and without their having established a need to—is an outdated, ineffective practice.

Do this instead

Instead, learn a method to help the customer feel a need to start developing the desire to meet.

Want more meetings with decision-makers? Stop requesting them. I dare you. Instead, start provoking discussions, piquing curiosity.

Stop trying to give-give-give, add value and clearly presenting offers. Start trying to provoke. Be un-clear. And super short.

“The offer is what you are offering or giving the reader. Yes! I said giving. If you're not offering the reader anything, why should they open it, read it, respond or even agree to what you're asking for?” asks Mr. Keenan.

Because you've sent a message provoking their curiosity.

Not because you offered clear, compelling value.

This is sales, not marketing. STOP writing like a marketer. Start earning more response. Update your belief system.

Stand out & provoke curiosity 

Effective email and voicemail outreach messages contain:

  • research or observation about the prospect (the relevancy piece)
  • fewer than 5 sentences (short, able to be read on a smart device & responded to in less than 30 seconds)
  • a provocative, non-biased question in place of a call to action (yes, calls to action are also poisonous)

Last week in the Academy we were working with Susan, a seasoned Manpower rep (selling staffing solutions). She has 35 years of experience. But lately, she isn't getting enough conversations started with F500 clients. We've transformed her communication technique. 

Here's one of the provocations we developed.

Dave,
Noticing you need an AE in Denver. What would cause you to examine different ways to recruit sales talent?

Regards,
Susan

No pitching. No adding value.

Just a quip from a sales rep who's breaking the mold.

  • Short (stands out),
  • showing she's done homework on the prospect (relevancy) and
  • asks a question that doesn't make the prospect vulnerable to a sales pitch. (it's not a "hook")

Instead, the question asks only to open a discussion about the status quo. This is an advanced mental trigger technique called a "facilitative question." 

STOP: Before you run out and try to copy Susan's approach beware. This is one of many options which may (or may NOT) work for you... depending on 5-7 factors.

There are other (often better) options. Especially when creating a series of follow-up messages. This is a practice, NOT a template!

If you're ready to upgrade your communication technique step up. Increase your commitment to yourself. Join us in for an intensive workshop

Here is another example from Alex, who sells IT network threat intelligence software.

James,
Are you open to examining your internal threat intelligence tools? Because I suspect you are being prevented from seeing individual processes leading to an alarm.

What would cause you to examine your existing set of tools, James?

My best,

Alex

Again, we see Alex asking a facilitative question... an inward directed, non-biased question.

It's not biased to an answer Alex seeks... so he can sell to James.

Not a template!

STOP: Before you run out and try to copy Susan's approach beware.

This is one of many options which may (or may NOT) work for you... depending on 5-7 factors.

There are other (often better) options. Especially when creating a series of follow-up messages. This is a practice, NOT a template!

If you're ready to upgrade your communication technique watch us re-write under-performing messages, online, in a small group workshop. If you're a Gold member you'll attend live! (and have a chance to work one-on-one with me, on your challenge)

For the most ambitious we're offering a live, online Sales Copywriting Master Class + Coaching.

Jeff Molander

Sales communication coach & Managing partner

© Communications Edge Inc. All rights reserved. InMail® is a registered trademark of LinkedIn® Corporation. This site and the products and services offered on this site are not associated, affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by Linkedin, nor have they been reviewed, tested or certified by LinkedIn.

>